Evaluation of self-measured blood pressure monitoring in a southern rural West Virginia health system.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, an estimated 32.3% of adults in the US and nearly half (43.4%, 776 000) of adults in West Virginia (WV) had hypertension. Further, the Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke estimates an increase in the percentage of adults with hypertension in the US from 32.3% to 47.0%, with hypertension rates in WV rising as high as 58.7%, indicating a significant public health concern in the community. Hypertension increases the risk of several negative health outcomes, including heart disease and stroke, and leads to increased economic and chronic disease burden. Although certain unmodifiable factors (sex, age, race, ethnicity, and family history) increase the risk of developing hypertension, a healthy lifestyle - including a nutritious diet, maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding nicotine products, and participating in regular moderate physical activity - can decrease the risk of developing hypertension. Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring, or home BP monitoring, when integrated with a provider's clinical management approach, is linked to improvements in BP management and control. This study represents a mid-point assessment of a remote SMBP monitoring program implemented by Cabin Creek Health Systems (CCHS), a federally qualified health center, and its impact on BP control. METHODS: CCHS implemented SMBP programming in March 2020 as one element of a developing comprehensive program aimed at reducing uncontrolled hypertension, and therefore chronic disease burden, in its service area and patient population. The project, funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, continued to February 2023. This report represents a mid-point analysis and was based on the retrospective analysis of de-identified data collected for 234 patients to June 2022, who were assessed for changes in BP between the date of enrollment and the most recently available BP measurement. Patients were enrolled in the SMBP program if they exhibited current or previous indicators of uncontrolled hypertension (systolic ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg), at the discretion of their provider, and were equipped with an iBloodPressure cellular connected home BP monitoring system, manufactured by Smart Meter. Their BP readings were documented in the integration software TimeDoc Health and electronic health record athenahealth. RESULTS: At the time of enrollment, 201 (86.0%) patients had uncontrolled hypertension, with 116 (49.6%) patients having both uncontrolled systolic (≥140 mmHg) and diastolic (≥90 mmHg) values. At follow-up, the number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension decreased from 201 to 98 (41.9%), with only 36 (15.4%) patients having both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic values. Additionally, 26 (11.1%) patients were in hypertensive crisis at the time of enrollment, and no patients remained in crisis at the time of follow-up. The number of patients with BP values in the controlled range (systolic <140 mmHg and diastolic <90 mmHg) increased from 33 (14.1%) at enrollment to 136 (58.1%) at follow-up. Overall, there was a 44.0% increase in the number of patients with BP values in the controlled range at follow-up, and a concomitant 44.1% decrease in the number of patients in the uncontrolled range. These observations were consistent across multiple demographic indicators, including clinic location, three-digit zip code, and patient sex. CONCLUSION: Systematic implementation of remote BP monitoring, when integrated into clinician workflows, was associated with a substantial reduction in the number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in this rural federally qualified health center. Further, CCHS was successful in implementing a remote SMBP monitoring program in a community challenged with transportation insecurity, and poor cellular and broadband access, of which lessons learned are applicable to other health systems interested in pursuing comparable efforts.

Advancing Antimicrobial Stewardship in Outpatient Dialysis Centers Using the Positive Deviance Process.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major growing problem fueled by inappropriate use of antimicrobials. Patients requiring maintenance hemodialysis are at especially high risk for infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to combat the spread of resistant pathogens. This article describes in detail a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention that featured staff education and a behavioral change process, Positive Deviance, and its implementation in six outpatient hemodialysis units. Results of the intervention demonstrated a 6% month-to-month reduction in antimicrobial doses/100 patient months over the course of the 12 months intervention, with a decrease in mean antimicrobial doses from 22.6/100 to 10.5/100 patient months from the beginning to the end of the intervention period. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this multifaceted intervention in engaging staff and improving antimicrobial prescribing patterns.

The positive effects of an antimicrobial stewardship program targeting outpatient hemodialysis facilities.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs are effective in optimizing antimicrobial prescribing patterns and decreasing the negative outcomes of antimicrobial exposure, including the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms. In dialysis facilities, 30%-35% of antimicrobials are either not indicated or the type of antimicrobial is not optimal. Although antimicrobial stewardship programs are now implemented nationwide in hospital settings, programs specific to the maintenance dialysis facilities have not been developed. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program in reducing antimicrobial prescribing.Study design and settingAn interrupted time-series study in 6 outpatient hemodialysis facilities was conducted in which mean monthly antimicrobial doses per 100 patient months during the 12 months prior to the program were compared to those in the 12-month intervention period. RESULTS: Implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program was associated with a 6% monthly reduction in antimicrobial doses per 100 patient months during the intervention period (P=.02). The initial mean of 22.6 antimicrobial doses per 100 patient months decreased to a mean of 10.5 antimicrobial doses per 100 patient months at the end of the intervention. There were no significant changes in antimicrobial use by type, including vancomycin. Antimicrobial adjustments were recommended for 30 of 145 antimicrobial courses (20.6%) for which there were sufficient clinical data. The most frequent reasons for adjustment included de-escalation from vancomycin to cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections and discontinuation of antimicrobials when criteria for presumed infection were not met. CONCLUSIONS: Within 6 hemodialysis facilities, implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship was associated with a decline in antimicrobial prescribing with no negative effects.